Juridical Analysis of Online Gambling Crimes Based on Decision Number 100/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Sda

Authors

  • Arly Andreas Lumban Toruana Author
  • Mochammad Fahmi Ulum Universitas Sumatera Utara Author
  • Berardy Shane Haposan Aritonang Universitas Sumatera Utara Author
  • Rosmalinda Universitas Sumatera Utara Author
  • Annisa Hafizhah Universitas Sumatera Utara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64670/jlpr.v2i1.75

Keywords:

Online Gambling, Legal Analysis, Criminal Code, ITE Act, Court Ruling

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has contributed to the increasing prevalence of online gambling in Indonesia, giving rise to significant social and legal challenges. This study examines the criminal liability of online gambling perpetrators based on Court Decision Number 100/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Sda and evaluates the appropriateness of the legal reasoning adopted by the court. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach by analyzing the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), and relevant judicial decisions. The findings indicate that the judge correctly applied the constituent elements of the online gambling offense under Article 303 of the Criminal Code and Article 27 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 45 of the ITE Law, supported by electronic evidence and witness testimony. The decision affirms that active participants in online gambling activities may be held criminally liable under both the Criminal Code and the ITE Law. This study contributes theoretically by clarifying the construction and application of the lex specialis principle in online gambling cases and offers practical insights for law enforcement officials in assessing electronic evidence similar cases. 

References

Adhar, Y. I., Wadhani, M., & Addarunnafis, M. (2025). Perubahan Struktur Bahasa dalam Komunikasi Digital di Media Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 5(November).

Alamsyah, B. I., & Yustitianingtyas, L. (2023). Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Judi Online Higgs Domino Island Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional. Journal Equitable, 8(3), 95–110.

Arifaid, P. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris Terhadap Akta in Originali. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(3), 510. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v5i3.456

Aringga, R. D., & Meuraksa, M. A. E. W. (2024). Mewujudkan Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Perjudian Online di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 1.

Azis, M. A., Purwanda, S., Darwis, M., Kairuddin, K., & Tijjang, B. (2025). Tindak Pidana Judi Online Sebagai Kejahatan Siber: Analisis Normatif Terhadap Efektivitas Regulasi Di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(4), 3912–3928. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i4.20675

Dewi, N. P. S. P., Arsawati, N. N. J., Gorda, A. N. T. R., & Mahadewi, K. J. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online di Tingkat Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(4), 5760–5768.

Fadhli, M. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online. Indragiri Law Review, 2(2), 19–24.

Firmansyah. (2025). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana mengenai Kejahatan Judi Online (Cyber Gambling) di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(3), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i4.4473

Hasan, Z., Apriano, I. D., Simatupang, Y. S., & Muntari, A. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian. Jurnal Multimedia Dehasen, 2(3), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i1.1717

Hasnawati, H., & Safrin, M. (2023). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1207–1214. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2878

Indrawan, K., & Dinata, M. R. K. (2025). Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora (AJSH) Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online di Indonesia dalam Putusan Nomor 244/Pid.B/2024/PN Kbu. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 683–687.

Jaunifa, R., Maritasari, D. B., Kholiza, N., & Sholihah, M. (2025). Dampak Media Sosial Terhadap Pola Interaksi Sosial Siswa: Kajian Kualitatif Dalam Konteks IPS. JIIPSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia, 5(2), 173–189.

Kadir, S. A., Rohmat, N., & Kaya, A. E. M. (2025). KAJIAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA JUDI ONLINE DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DAN KITAB UNDANG- UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia, 6(2), 167–186.

Putri, D., Farid, M., Tamza, F. B., Achmad, D., & Meidiantama, R. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pemain Judi Online Melalui Situs Website. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1), 4028–4033.

Setiawati, S., & Dewi, S. (2023). Urgensi Pengaturan Secara Khusus Judi Online Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 3(1), 10–27.

Sri Nur Damayana, & Muh Anugrah Kurniawan Amir. (2024). Politik Hukum Pidana dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Judi Online di Indonesia. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1791

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Juridical Analysis of Online Gambling Crimes Based on Decision Number 100/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Sda. (2026). Journal of Law Perspectives Review, 2(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.64670/jlpr.v2i1.75