Phoenix Company and Tax Crimes: An Analysis of Administrative Penal Law as a Model of Law Enforcement

Authors

  • Febrian Halomoan Universitas Pembangunan nasional Veteran Jakarta Author
  • Handoyo Prasetyo Universitas Pembangunan nasional Veteran Jakarta Author
  • Slamet Tri Wahyudi Universitas Pembangunan nasional Veteran Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64670/jlpr.v2i2.93

Keywords:

Phoenix Company, Tax Avoidance, Administrative Penal Law, Tax Compliance, SMEs

Abstract

This study examines the misuse of tax facilities through the Phoenix Company scheme and analyzes the application of administrative penal law as a law enforcement model in Indonesia's taxation system. The research is normative legal research employing statute and comparative approaches, supported by secondary data from legislation, literature, and relevant legal documents. The findings reveal that the Phoenix Company practice is a form of tax avoidance that exploits regulatory gaps, particularly in the application of final income tax for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Through strategies such as firm-splitting and income bunching, taxpayers artificially maintain their turnover below the threshold to benefit from lower tax rates, despite operating as a single economic entity. This practice distorts tax fairness, reduces state revenue, and undermines the effectiveness of fiscal policy. Furthermore, the study finds that Indonesian tax law does not explicitly regulate illegal phoenix activities, resulting in enforcement relying on general provisions and principles such as substance over form. In this context, the administrative penal law approach offers a balanced framework by prioritizing administrative sanctions to restore state losses while retaining criminal sanctions as a last resort (ultimum remedium). The study suggests strengthening regulatory frameworks, enhancing inter-agency coordination, and optimizing data integration systems to improve detection and enforcement.

References

Adelina, D. A., & Nugrahanto, A. (2021). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak Pada Self Assessment System Di Indonesia. Jurnal Informasi Perpajakan Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Publik, 16(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v16i1.8374

Barus, L. B., & Pramana, Y. (2022). Ultimum Remedium Dalam Tindak Pidana Pajak Daerah Di Indonesia. Journal of Tax Law and Policy, 1(3), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.56282/jtlp.v1i3.482

Budiarsih, R., & Sony, H. (2022). Persepsi Pelaku UMKM Terhadap Alternatif Model Pemungutan Pajak UMKM Dengan Pemanfaatan Teknologi QRIS. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 6(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v6i1.1549

Darmanti, R. M., & Mangkan, D. (2020). The Implementation of Automatic Exchange of Information as a Tool to Tackle Offshore Tax Evasion: An Experience From Indonesia. Scientax, 2(1), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.52869/st.v2i1.61

Erdiansyah, A. V, & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2021). Formal Tax Compliance In Indonesia Through Electronic Tax Filing: A Case Study Of Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v5i1.1237

Liunda, S. A. H., Kaur, B., & Rasji, R. (2024). Perwujudan Sila Ke-5 Pancasila Dalam Peraturan Wajib Pajak Di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education and Development Research, 2(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijedr.v2i1.1583

Lutfillah, N. Q., & Ndapa, A. E. (2022). Determinants of Individual Taxpayer Compliance: Motivation, Level of Education, and Tax Sanctions. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 6(2S), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v6i2s.1965

Murweni, I., & Gunardi, G. (2018). Pelaksanaan Program Tax Amnesty Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Badan. Jurnal E-Bis (Ekonomi-Bisnis), 2(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.37339/e-bis.v2i2.84

Nasrullah, N., & Anggia, P. (2020). Regulating Indonesian Tax Consultant Profession: Is It Necessary? Varia Justicia, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v16i2.3740

Nugraha, N. A., & Darono, A. (2022). Discourses and Institutions in Tax Policy and Fiscal Sustainability: Evidence From Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (Pkn), 4(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v4i1.1722

Pramono, W. (2017). Penyamaan Persepsi Dan Kerjasama Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Bidang Perpajakan Untuk Mendukung Optimalisasi Penerimaan Negara. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8708

Putri, N. S., & Daito, A. (2021). The Influence of E-Tax Services, Income and Communication Style on Tax Compliance. Dinasti International Journal of Economics Finance & Accounting, 2(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v2i1.803

Rawling, M., & Schofield-Georgeson, E. (2019). Industrial Legislation in Australia in 2018. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(3), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619834058

Rufaedah, Y., & Hadiani, F. (1970). Pengaruh Reformasi Administrasi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Badan Pada KPP Pratama Se-Bandung Raya. Sigmamu, 7(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.35313/sigmamu.v7i1.834

Sari, R. N., Herawati, N., & Pauzi, N. F. M. (2023). The Mapping of Tax Compliance Research in Indonesia. Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 11(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v11i1.122635

Suharyadi, S., Nasrullah, N., & Riyanto, D. (2024). The Influence of the Motor Vehicle Tax Reduction Program and Exemption of Transfer of Title Fees on Taxpayer Compliance in the North Jakarta Region. Jisip (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 8(1), 493. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6305

Tan, D., & Sudirman, L. (2020). Final Income Tax: A Classic Contemporary Concept to Increase Voluntary Tax Compliance Among Legal Professions in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(1), 125–170. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.37308

Wardani, D. K., & Wati, A. I. (2022). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness on Intention to Pay Taxes. Reslaj Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 5(3), 726–732. https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v5i4.2021

Wiyono, W., Sari, M. E. P., & Effendi, W. R. (2020). Analisis Peraturan Menteri Republik Indonesia Nomor 118/PMK.03/2016 Tentang Pelaksanaan Uu NO.11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak Di Kota Batam Tahun 2016. Jurnal Trias Politika, 4(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v4i2.2652

Zulaikha, Z., & Hadiprajitno, P. T. B. (2017). Presumptive Taxation Scheme: Its Impact on Tax Expense and Taxpayer�s Compliance. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.346

Zulma, G. W. M., Lutfi, L., & Gowon, M. (2019). Era Baru: Persepsi Mendasar Wajib Pajak Terhadap Tingkat Kepatuhan Pajak. Ekonomis Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v3i2.70

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Phoenix Company and Tax Crimes: An Analysis of Administrative Penal Law as a Model of Law Enforcement. (2026). Journal of Law Perspectives Review, 2(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.64670/jlpr.v2i2.93